Originally posted by: @meno
Thanx for the info mate.
Was wondering whether to get the FX to run 4x4 or wait for the Agena.
I think for the time being the better choice would be waiting a little longer as the price for 2 units of FX is a little too pricey IMHO.
At the time I put this pc together (Feb), Intel's best was over $1300 and the 74,s just under $500 each at newegg, since it takes 2, to create the quad for AMD.. The thought of the Intel crashing..and waiting on replacement, compared to a 74 crashing..and only having to wait for 1 cpu..and the pc is still usable. Not only the fact of cost..if it were to be my fault. Those were my deciding factors.
And the 4x4 name...should actually be 2coresx2cores=4.
The 74's supposedly will be able to run with more cpu's then 2, together eventually..I think a MB needs to be designed.
The Intel will OC much higher....but I don't see this system needs any oc'ing (4x3000mhz is plenty).
It will run several apps/games at one time, I've even ran 3dmark06 full test, while 4 games were launched and talking on Ventrilo over the net (had to minimize all during bench mark).
I knew there would be issues starting off with Vista 64 bit...but things have been coming together very nicely for it.
I'm looking forward to the next cpu's offered from AMD.
-------------------------
ASUS L1N64-SLI 680a WS Dual Socket L, 2x AMD Athlon 64 FX-74, 2x ASUS EN8800GTX/DDR3/768M (SLI),
2x WD 150GB Raptors 10000rpm-Raid0, 4gig Corsair DDR2@800mhz-PC6400, Dell 30in (2560x1600),
Enermax Galaxy 1000W, ThermalTake Armour Extreme, Vista Ultimate-64bit OS...
TrackIR:4 Pro