I wrote a small topic in general technology forum this morning and I can't seem to find it now ?

Is there's something wrong with it ?

I can't find it anywhere. Make it again I suppose.

What was the topic?

-------------------------
The opinions expressed above do not represent those of Advanced Micro Devices or any of their affiliates.

1100t on M5A99x-EVO with 2x4gb and 6870 running Win7 on Force120 ssd in Corsair 600t cooled by H100. Folding for team 34106

It was about Bulldozer's dual core is 2 integers and 1 FPU...

I saw my History, thread id is 123202

when I open the page from History I get this message



Here's the thread link from my History
http://forums.amd.com/forum/me...id=123202&startpage=1

title is
(Does AMD want to sell us 1.5 cores as dual cores ? 2 + 0.5 + 0.5 cores as quad cores ?)

Think about the name of the title and the topic in question and then think about what forum your in a sec.

Now do you really think its wise to post such things here?

Honestly now, give it some thought.

-------------------------
AMD phenom II 1090T @ 4.23 Ghz custom water cooled
Asrock 890 FX deluxe 3 mother board
4 GB DDR 3 1600 @ 1688 Mhz 7 7 7 24 T1 2688 Mhz NB
2x 1 TB WD Sata III 64 mb cache HDD,s raid 0
2x 5870 HD @ 1015/1300 Asus reference
Dual OS win 7 x64 ultimate & win 7 x32 Ultimate (bench os)

I know what what do you mean, but the main idea behind the topic is to discuss this idea from technical POV and consumer POV of being a single/dual core, and a technical side with the design... it's not an attack to AMD, maybe you and some mod. will see the title as an attack but it was in a hurry and I didn't pick the right title...

This may be a little beside the point, but what is there to talk about? The terminology of calling these things "cores" might suck, yeah... but either it's going to stick, or it isn't.

-------------------------
Containment Breach

Do not meddle in the affairs of archers, for they are subtle and quick to anger.