 |
AMD Game |
 |
 |  |
|
Topic Title: My first 5870 benchmark results Topic Summary: Created On: 10/06/2009 01:29 AM Status: Post and Reply |
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch |
|
 Search Topic |
Topic Tools
|
 10/06/2009 01:29 AM
|
|
|
Crysis GPU Benchmark 3D Mark06: Vantage:
Not bad for a single GPU card ------------------------- Phenom II 965BE @ 3.4 Ghz |
|
|
|
|
|
10/06/2009 01:37 AM
|
|
|
not bad ! ------------------------- Q9650 @4.2 ghz , asus rampage formula x48, 4 gigs mushkin ascents 1066mhz @1135mhz! ,(os)2x80 gig intel x-25 m raid0, (games) 2x 300 gig velociraptor raid0,(storage) 750 gig , CF - both xfx hd4890xt's at (1000/1200) , x-fi elitepro/z-5500 , corsair hx1000 , dell 3008 lcd (2560x1600) and a panasonic 50 inch plasma (1920x1080) , modified antec p180b , rediculous watercooling set up:) windows 7 ultimate 64 bit |
|
|
|
|
|
10/06/2009 07:51 AM
|
|
|
I thought you were waiting for the 5870x2. so which one did you get , sapphire? and why did you run just high, why not very high? ------------------------- System Specs:Windows Vista 32bit basic, ATI catalyst 9.8, CCC, I7 920 @ 3GHZ, XFX 4890/ XFX4870 XXX 1 GIG Crossfire, 3gig RAm, MSI X58 PLATINUM mobo, Corsair 850TX PSU, Apevia Sniper-G case. |
|
|
|
|
|
10/06/2009 10:39 AM
|
|
|
if you have time, try running the crysis benchmark at 1920x1200 8xaa (verry high) then post your results
is that the highest you can push your 940 be ? push it harder !! it will let that card breath !
------------------------- Q9650 @4.2 ghz , asus rampage formula x48, 4 gigs mushkin ascents 1066mhz @1135mhz! ,(os)2x80 gig intel x-25 m raid0, (games) 2x 300 gig velociraptor raid0,(storage) 750 gig , CF - both xfx hd4890xt's at (1000/1200) , x-fi elitepro/z-5500 , corsair hx1000 , dell 3008 lcd (2560x1600) and a panasonic 50 inch plasma (1920x1080) , modified antec p180b , rediculous watercooling set up:) windows 7 ultimate 64 bit |
|
|
|
|
|
10/06/2009 10:50 AM
|
|
|
I just did some Crysis benches last night. Here's what I got: GPU Benchmark looped 99 times (testing for stability)... 1920 x 1080 DX10 4xAA (supersample forced via CCC) Very High + Custom config (slight variation from HP Config)... 2 XFX 5870's in CF @ 900/1265 1.175v temps under 70(C) custom fan profile These are average scores from 99 runs: min frame: 30.31 avg fps: 45.10 max frame: 56.01 ------------------------- i7 920 @ 4.4 HT off | 6GB Dominator GT @ 1600 6-7-6-18 | Rampage II Extreme | Antec 1000W | WD 400GB | 2 - XFX 5870's | Windows 7 64bit Build 7100 & Vista Home Premium 64bit |
|
|
|
|
|
10/06/2009 12:09 PM
|
|
|
im sure theres lots of room for improvement in the drivers , cause i get those results with my setup ! except i run at 1920x1200
apparently theres no need to upgrade yet !
dagimp16 was that test run with your i7 at 4.4 ghz ? ------------------------- Q9650 @4.2 ghz , asus rampage formula x48, 4 gigs mushkin ascents 1066mhz @1135mhz! ,(os)2x80 gig intel x-25 m raid0, (games) 2x 300 gig velociraptor raid0,(storage) 750 gig , CF - both xfx hd4890xt's at (1000/1200) , x-fi elitepro/z-5500 , corsair hx1000 , dell 3008 lcd (2560x1600) and a panasonic 50 inch plasma (1920x1080) , modified antec p180b , rediculous watercooling set up:) windows 7 ultimate 64 bit |
|
|
|
|
|
10/06/2009 01:00 PM
|
|
|
man i really wish i had one of those... seriously im just dreaming.... i cant afford it atm X.X and i want it so badly no kidding T_T
------------------------- Comp1: AMD Phenom II 940 - AMD/ATi Radon HD4870 - 4GB Mushkin PC2 996580PCGH @ DDR1100 - Asus M4A79 Deluxe 790FX Comp2: Intel Core2 E7200@ 3,8Ghz - AMD/ATi Radeon HD3850x2 - 4GB Mushkin PC2 996580PCGH @ DDR1020 - Abit IP35 Server: AMD Opteron 154 - Corsair 2GB DDR400 2.0 2 2 5 - DFI Lanparty UT CFX3200 - 2x Spinpoint F1 1TB Raid |
|
|
|
|
|
10/06/2009 03:37 PM
|
|
|
I changed my mind.. this time around i thought i would try 2 separate cards instead... besides, they run cooler if only one GPU. The x2's were always relly hot and fans always audible. I can try Crysis on very high this afternoon and post. Oh. and yes, it is a Sapphire. ------------------------- Phenom II 965BE @ 3.4 Ghz |
|
|
|
|
|
10/06/2009 03:42 PM
|
|
|
yep, my test was run on the system in my signature at those settings. So what your saying is that your 4890's in CF OC'd are producing the same frame rates as my 5870's OC'd?!?! If that's the case, WOW!! I am upset, and then not.... I upgraded from 2 3870x2's and loved it! But if i'm only getting CF OC'd 4890 performance that would be a waste of money! hopefully the driver updates turn out to be like they were with the 3870x2's. Over the time I had them (over 1 year) their performance more than doubled due to driver improvements. I hope they do the same with this new generation of cards. ------------------------- i7 920 @ 4.4 HT off | 6GB Dominator GT @ 1600 6-7-6-18 | Rampage II Extreme | Antec 1000W | WD 400GB | 2 - XFX 5870's | Windows 7 64bit Build 7100 & Vista Home Premium 64bit |
|
|
|
|
|
10/06/2009 04:09 PM
|
|
|
yup that is what i'm saying !i'm sure performance will increase, it allways does . i'm sure it was a nice performance boost coming from dual 3870x2's did you run the test in windows 7 or vista ? ------------------------- Q9650 @4.2 ghz , asus rampage formula x48, 4 gigs mushkin ascents 1066mhz @1135mhz! ,(os)2x80 gig intel x-25 m raid0, (games) 2x 300 gig velociraptor raid0,(storage) 750 gig , CF - both xfx hd4890xt's at (1000/1200) , x-fi elitepro/z-5500 , corsair hx1000 , dell 3008 lcd (2560x1600) and a panasonic 50 inch plasma (1920x1080) , modified antec p180b , rediculous watercooling set up:) windows 7 ultimate 64 bit |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2009 03:55 AM
|
|
|
is that the highest you can push your 940 be ? push it harder !! it will let that card breath !
Ok .. Here are my Crysis results @ 1920x1080 ( can't do 1920x1200 ) Very High Spec : 4xAA Min 14fps Avg 32fps Max 37fps 8xAA Min 19fps Avg 30fps Max 36fps
I have gotten my 940BE @ 4Ghz but can't get it stable ------------------------- Phenom II 965BE @ 3.4 Ghz |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2009 04:02 AM
|
|
|
@ steveo_crossfire I'm having trouble swollowing this. No offence dude, but can you run your tests again ? ------------------------- Phenom II 965BE @ 3.4 Ghz |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2009 11:23 AM
|
|
|
hey there good morning ! just ran the benchmarks again for you here are my results 1920x1200 very high 4xaa min 15.21 fps avg 51.53 fps max 73.82 fps 8xaa min 14.11 fps avg 48.33 fps max 70.98 fps
i know these are hard to believe , but this is no bs ! i've allmost allways benchmark higher then the reviews for some reason ! but i'm not complaining ! lol do you have hawkx ? if you do run that benchmark, i get way higher then any benchmark i've seen ! here are my results 1920x1200 all setting maxed dx10.1 8xaa 132 fps min 398 fps max !! 3d06 = 26354
------------------------- Q9650 @4.2 ghz , asus rampage formula x48, 4 gigs mushkin ascents 1066mhz @1135mhz! ,(os)2x80 gig intel x-25 m raid0, (games) 2x 300 gig velociraptor raid0,(storage) 750 gig , CF - both xfx hd4890xt's at (1000/1200) , x-fi elitepro/z-5500 , corsair hx1000 , dell 3008 lcd (2560x1600) and a panasonic 50 inch plasma (1920x1080) , modified antec p180b , rediculous watercooling set up:) windows 7 ultimate 64 bit |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2009 11:50 AM
|
|
|
hi again i just noticed something strange ! your first crysis bench score vs your second run ! your first run at 2x aa (min 29 avg 52 max 71) your second run at 4xaa (min 14 avg 32 max 37) high 2x aa to very high 4xaa , i will re run the benchmark at high 2x aa for comparison ok here are the results (1920x1080 2x aa high settings) min 33.25 avg 64.91 max 89.54
------------------------- Q9650 @4.2 ghz , asus rampage formula x48, 4 gigs mushkin ascents 1066mhz @1135mhz! ,(os)2x80 gig intel x-25 m raid0, (games) 2x 300 gig velociraptor raid0,(storage) 750 gig , CF - both xfx hd4890xt's at (1000/1200) , x-fi elitepro/z-5500 , corsair hx1000 , dell 3008 lcd (2560x1600) and a panasonic 50 inch plasma (1920x1080) , modified antec p180b , rediculous watercooling set up:) windows 7 ultimate 64 bit Edited: 10/07/2009 at 12:04 PM by steveo_crossfire |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2009 12:47 PM
|
|
|
@ steveo_crossfire Your results remind me of my 2 3870x2's performance in game. Watching the displayinfo my frame rates were averaging ~35fps, but the lows were around 12fps and the highs 90+fps! Crysis is definetly a new game now. I played with the same settings minus the AA and it was a bit choppy, still playable for me, through the whole game. Oh yeah, the visuals (particles, textures, physics, etc.) are OUTSTANDING I also benched RE5 DX10: all settings maxed, no vsync, unlocked frame rate, 8xAA, 1920 x 1080 average about 150fps through fixed benchmark ~150fps in scenes 1, 2, 4 in the variable benchmark scene 3 did see 60fps at the low point and an average about 120fps once it gets going through the scene.
------------------------- i7 920 @ 4.4 HT off | 6GB Dominator GT @ 1600 6-7-6-18 | Rampage II Extreme | Antec 1000W | WD 400GB | 2 - XFX 5870's | Windows 7 64bit Build 7100 & Vista Home Premium 64bit |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2009 02:44 PM
|
|
|
your first crysis bench score vs your second run ! your first run at 2x aa (min 29 avg 52 max 71) your second run at 4xaa (min 14 avg 32 max 37) high 2x aa to very high 4xaa , i will re run the benchmark at high 2x aa for comparison ok here are the results (1920x1080 2x aa high settings) min 33.25 avg 64.91 max 89.54
WTF !?!?!? My 5870 is getting a flogging !! Can someone explain this ? I think i'm gonna be sick ... No seriously, can someone explain this to me ? All the reviews put the 5870 well ahead of the 4890. Were they using some magic drivers or something ?? ------------------------- Phenom II 965BE @ 3.4 Ghz |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2009 02:56 PM
|
|
|
Remember he's got 2 4890's and they are overclocked. I'm sure you and I will benefit from future driver updates more so than those 4890's. It looks like you are getting performance that's just a tad under 2 overclocked 4890's with only 1 5870. Don't worry, you have a good card. ------------------------- i7 920 @ 4.4 HT off | 6GB Dominator GT @ 1600 6-7-6-18 | Rampage II Extreme | Antec 1000W | WD 400GB | 2 - XFX 5870's | Windows 7 64bit Build 7100 & Vista Home Premium 64bit |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2009 03:03 PM
|
|
|
Thanks for the morale boost dagimp16.. I just cracked my cpu to 3.9Ghz and ran the benchmark again: High Spec, 2xAA 1920x1080 and i have the exact same results as 3.6Ghz. Shouldn't it have increased ?
------------------------- Phenom II 965BE @ 3.4 Ghz |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2009 03:04 PM
|
|
|
your first crysis bench score vs your second run ! your first run at 2x aa (min 29 avg 52 max 71) your second run at 4xaa (min 14 avg 32 max 37) high 2x aa to very high 4xaa , i will re run the benchmark at high 2x aa for comparison ok here are the results (1920x1080 2x aa high settings) min 33.25 avg 64.91 max 89.54
Hey steveo, can you run the benchmark with your cards at stock speed ? tia ------------------------- Phenom II 965BE @ 3.4 Ghz |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2009 04:01 PM
|
|
|
Sounds to me like your CPU @ 3.6 is plenty for 1 5870. You might notice a difference between 3.6 and 3.9 when your second card comes in, but I'm not too sure. My system scored the same GPU score in vantage at 4.2 Hyperthreading vs 4.4 no Hyperthreading. I also tested crysis and it only uses 4 cores. So I figure I'll let 4 cores run as fast as they can, screw hyperthreading, I'm gaming. @ neo5555: Are you seeing white dots in the dark shadows in Crysis? I have 'em even at stock clocks! I know it's not the temps (always under 70C). I also notice a few other people have the same problem, hopefully better drivers will fix that. ------------------------- i7 920 @ 4.4 HT off | 6GB Dominator GT @ 1600 6-7-6-18 | Rampage II Extreme | Antec 1000W | WD 400GB | 2 - XFX 5870's | Windows 7 64bit Build 7100 & Vista Home Premium 64bit |
|
|
|
|
AMD Game
» AMD Technology » ATI Radeon Graphics
»
My first 5870 benchmark results
|
Topic Tools |
FuseTalk Hosting Executive Plan v3.2 - © 1999-2009 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.
