Topic Title: AMD FX Windows Hotfix / patches for FX-8350 still required?
Topic Summary: Are the two patches still needed for Windows 7?
Created On: 03/24/2014 09:15 PM
Status: Post and Reply
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
Search Topic Search Topic
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View similar topics View similar topics
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 03/24/2014 09:15 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
-rascal-
Farming Materials

Posts: 548
Joined: 01/15/2011

Oh god...I haven't been on the forums in a looong while; hope all you good people are doing okay in 2014 thus far.

Anywho, I've finally made the leap into the AM3+ / FX bandwagon, and grabbed a FX-8350. Simply put, I'm just wondering if the two Windows patches are still needed for the Vishera / "Piledriver" CPUs.

I recall the hotfixes were released during the time of the "Bulldozers," and I'm not sure if the issues related to the patches (Windows scheduling and Core parking) still need to be installed manually, or it has been resolved with the Visheras / Windows Update.

Just so you know, I'm doing bechmarks....ehh...a little personal review and comparison between the FX-8350 and Phenom II X6 1090T. It's still in progress...but have a look if you're interested.

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/127576-fx-8350-am3-processor-review-phenom-ii-x6-1090t-versus-fx-8350-comparisons/

Thank you in advance!!



-------------------------

FX-8350 @ 4.8GHz // ASUS Crosshair V Formula 990FX // Sapphire Vapor-X HD 7970 + Dual-X HD 7970 // Thermaltake Frio w/ push-pull (using Antec Formula 7 Nano-Diamond + Cooler Master JetFlo fans) // 8GB (2 X 4GB) G.Skill RipJawsX 2133MHz  // Corsair TX850 850W // Corsair Force GT 120GB SSD (OS) // Kingston V200+ 120GB SSD // WD Caviar Black 1TB // Windows 7 Ult x64

 03/24/2014 09:19 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
AMDforMe
Overclocker

Posts: 675
Joined: 09/08/2013

IME you still need to manually install them. There is ~5% performance gain on average so it's not much. Win 8 reportedly has a slightly improved scheduler over the Win 7 patch by a couple percent.



-------------------------

Technical ignorance is NOT a destiny it is a choice. Do your homework so that you can make technically informed decisions and not be duped by advertising hype or mis-information stated as fact when its not.


 

 03/24/2014 10:41 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
-rascal-
Farming Materials

Posts: 548
Joined: 01/15/2011

I see, hmm...

I just ran a few tests using Cinebench R15, and it's using all "8 cores" okay. All the cores are running at 100%.

When Windows is idling (sitting at Desktop) some of the cores are parked.

I'll check with a few games, and a few of the bechmarking methodologies [i.e. WinRAR on 5GB+ of files, 3D Mark (2013) , etc], and report back.



-------------------------

FX-8350 @ 4.8GHz // ASUS Crosshair V Formula 990FX // Sapphire Vapor-X HD 7970 + Dual-X HD 7970 // Thermaltake Frio w/ push-pull (using Antec Formula 7 Nano-Diamond + Cooler Master JetFlo fans) // 8GB (2 X 4GB) G.Skill RipJawsX 2133MHz  // Corsair TX850 850W // Corsair Force GT 120GB SSD (OS) // Kingston V200+ 120GB SSD // WD Caviar Black 1TB // Windows 7 Ult x64

 03/25/2014 08:30 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
black_zion
80 Column Mind

Posts: 12908
Joined: 04/17/2008

I haven't noticed any real world (games, audio and video encoding) differences.

-------------------------
AMD FX-8350 w/ Corsair H105, ASUS Sabertooth 990FX Gen3/R2, 8GiB G.SKILL DDR3-2133, XFX HD 7970, 512GB Vertex 4, 256GB Vector, 240GB Agility 3, Creative X-Fi Titanium w/ Creative Gigaworks S750, SeaSonic X750, Corsair C70, HP ZR2440w, Win 7 Ultimate x64
 03/25/2014 08:42 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
Robocod
Peon

Posts: 15
Joined: 03/24/2014

I never needed to install any patches and I was gaming heavy,video editing etc.Win7 pro.

 03/25/2014 12:28 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
AMDforMe
Overclocker

Posts: 675
Joined: 09/08/2013

The FX processors do NOT require the Windoze 7 "patch" to function properly. It is a minor tweek to the O/S scheduler that shows on average ~5% gain. Some programs show a little more and some show a little less. Most people would not even notice 5% change in PC performance.



-------------------------

Technical ignorance is NOT a destiny it is a choice. Do your homework so that you can make technically informed decisions and not be duped by advertising hype or mis-information stated as fact when its not.


 

Statistics
87580 users are registered to the AMD Support and Game forum.
There are currently 2 users logged in.

FuseTalk Hosting Executive Plan v3.2 - © 1999-2014 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.