Topic Title: Need some insight, WDDM vs WDM
Topic Summary:
Created On: 12/18/2013 02:58 PM
Status: Post and Reply
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
Search Topic Search Topic
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View similar topics View similar topics
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 12/18/2013 02:58 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
Eydee
Ninja Zombie Killer

Posts: 4905
Joined: 12/27/2008

This is not something I lose sleep over, only something I'm interested in. Take a look at the second rig in my sig. Fairly ancient, this is the point.

Now let's put Window Vista or 7 on it (performs the same). Then let's benchmark 2 scenarios:

#1: WDM XP drivers installed

#2 WDDM Vista drivers installed

 

#1 has decent 3D performance, actually faster than XP drivers on XP. (However, it's pretty ugly without aero...)

#2 has approx 25-30% less performance. The performance loss seems to be CPU related, as any graphics settings will provide smaller frame rates. The higher the graphics settings, the closer the results of the two benchmarks go to each other.

Note #1: It's not the aero effect or dwm, I disabled both for the banchmark. Even using the WDDM driver windows renders stuff in fallback mode.

Note #2: It cannot be the WDDM driver being unoptimized. It's an X1xx series card, whose driver went throgh a 3-year developement cycle. AMD optimizes drivers to max performance in approx 0,5-1 years.

So... Is it WDDM being that *****on single core CPUs? Is it a bloatware we don't notice on modern computers? Any ideas?



-------------------------

CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 810 @ 3120MHz | RAM: Kingmax 2x2GB DDR2 800 @ 833MHz| MoBo: MSI K9A2 CF v1.0 (BIOS: 1.D)| GPU: Asus HD 6850 1024MB (DirectCu) @ 835/1135MHz | Display: L24FHD | PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750 Quad | OS: MS Windows 3.11 Pro x64

 12/18/2013 05:30 PM
User is online View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
black_zion
80 Column Mind

Posts: 12489
Joined: 04/17/2008

I would say it comes from overhead that computers with a dual core processor wouldn't notice. Though I can imagine there is a bit of unnecessary redundancy and unoptimized code that was never taken care of.

-------------------------
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX/Gen3 R2, FX-8350 w/ Corsair H60, 8 GiB G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3-2133, XFX HD 7970 Ghz, 512GB Vertex 4, 256GB Vector, 240GB Agility 3, Creative X-Fi Titanium w/ Creative Gigaworks S750, SeaSonic X750, HP ZR2440w, Win 7 Ultimate x64
Statistics
85504 users are registered to the AMD Support and Game forum.
There are currently 2 users logged in.

FuseTalk Hosting Executive Plan v3.2 - © 1999-2014 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.