Topic Title: Crossfire 7750 Horizontal artifacts when turning vsync off on dx9
Topic Summary:
Created On: 06/10/2014 08:52 PM
Status: Post and Reply
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
<< 1 2 Previous Last unread
Search Topic Search Topic
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View similar topics View similar topics
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 06/11/2014 05:21 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
GreenPixel
Peon

Posts: 14
Joined: 06/10/2014

it only suffer if game engine is not optimised, anyway you will get mixed results, but performance impact is not so hudge



Edited: 06/11/2014 at 07:58 PM by GreenPixel
 06/12/2014 10:25 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
backFireX64
Ubergeek

Posts: 1860
Joined: 11/14/2010

Example:

 

Crysis 3, 1080p, v-sync on (i hate tearing) all ultra except object detail=high, fxaa.

 

1. when my card run at x16-x16 -> 60 fps (950mhz/ 1400mhz stable) 90% of my entire playthrough. Dipped to 52- 54 on the most render-demanding scenes.

 

2. now my card runs at x16-x4 -> 48-56 fps (same oc) 99% of my time in-game. You can add the f****ng stuttering at that. Dipps to 35 now as well.

 

I really dont like unnecessary compromises while gaming.

But that is just me, anyway.

 

 



-------------------------

gigabyte X58A-UD3R rev.2, core i7 975 3.9ghz (stock voltage), windows 8.1 64-bit, corsair 12gb DDR3 1600mhz 7-7-7-20 RAM, xfx HD 5970 + gigabyte HD 5970 (950mhz/ 1100mhz), coolermaster ultimate 900w PSU.
amd catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver

 06/14/2014 11:31 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
GreenPixel
Peon

Posts: 14
Joined: 06/10/2014

test dirt 3 performance, u will see almost no difference between 4x and 16x

EDIT:

any news about dx9 cf fixes ?



Edited: 06/14/2014 at 11:44 AM by GreenPixel
 06/14/2014 11:39 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
HoneyBadger84
Button Masher

Posts: 205
Joined: 06/10/2014

Originally posted by: GreenPixel test dirt 3 performance, u will see almost no difference between 4x and 16x

 

 

That's cuz Dirt 3 is ancient by graphical standards.  Lol



-------------------------

CPU: i7 3930k @ 4.6GHz 1.29V (Corsair H110-cooled) ~ Motherboard: Asus RoG Rampage IV Extreme 
RAM: G.Skill Sniper Gaming Series (4x4GB 2133MHz, CL9) ~ PSU: Corsair AX 1200W ~ Case: Enermax Fulmo GT
GPUs: 3x HIS R9 290X Reference (Core) Editions in TriFire, Max Load Temps: 71C/70C/71C during OC testing :-P

 06/14/2014 12:01 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
backFireX64
Ubergeek

Posts: 1860
Joined: 11/14/2010

Originally posted by: HoneyBadger84
Originally posted by: GreenPixel test dirt 3 performance, u will see almost no difference between 4x and 16x [IMG][/IMG]

 

 

 

 

 

 

That's cuz Dirt 3 is ancient by graphical standards.  Lol

 

 

Not that ancient, mind you, but i get the point.

I would really like to see a dx11/ dx9 pc racing game that looks (and plays) better than Dirt3 or even Dirt2 (which is my favourite).

Ok, maybe Grid 2 or the upcoming grid (i doubt that).

 

Imagine a racing game built around the latest CryEngine.

 

Answer:

YEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 



-------------------------

gigabyte X58A-UD3R rev.2, core i7 975 3.9ghz (stock voltage), windows 8.1 64-bit, corsair 12gb DDR3 1600mhz 7-7-7-20 RAM, xfx HD 5970 + gigabyte HD 5970 (950mhz/ 1100mhz), coolermaster ultimate 900w PSU.
amd catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver

Statistics
88898 users are registered to the AMD Support and Game forum.
There are currently 2 users logged in.

FuseTalk Hosting Executive Plan v3.2 - © 1999-2014 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.